Curse

Sir_BlackJack · May 09, 2006, 06:27 PM // 18:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxiemonster

I wish they'd just add monthly fee so they can afford employees that work their ass off all day long).

This would be nice if they didn't have a million Factions bugs to fix, but they do. Signing things that aren't easy, and aren't very important is simply useless.

/notsigned

/offtopic

GW is based on the idea of the non monthly fee system. Introducing it would wipe GW out.

They programmed GW:P with less bugs.

/topic

I did have a pokémon battle with my guild mate the day scrimmage got introduced

. It does not work really well though >_<.

kaya · May 09, 2006, 06:32 PM // 18:32

lol @ all the /not signed.

There's nothing wrong with adding a little extra sport to the game. Even if it's a little pokemon ish, so is a lot of other things in this game.

we all know that pets are... well not very popular. it's not too often you see anyone with them. why not add a little spice to your game, and give those pets some meaning. it wouldnt have to be for anything but pure enjoyment.

/signed

mqstout · May 09, 2006, 06:36 PM // 18:36

The problem is, it's for rangers only. And there's nothing possibly/remotely similar that could be done for other professions. Rangers are always wanting everything for their pets. While I like pets (and think they're still a little underwhelming), they shouldn't be treated specially.

Sir_BlackJack · May 10, 2006, 12:16 AM // 00:16

*cough*

Secondary Ranger?

unda dawg · May 10, 2006, 12:24 AM // 00:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misa

/not signed.

this sounds like a pokemon match o_o

"i choose u vicious tiger that will rip out all ur internal organs!"

unda dawg · May 10, 2006, 12:27 AM // 00:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goats17

I like the idea a little, just not the armor part.

/notsigned on both accounts.

I could never watch my little pet wither and die in the face on another pet

but ull let him b burned in the ring of fire? haha im jk

healthsoldier0570 · May 10, 2006, 01:52 AM // 01:52

I wish I could have changed this thread to pet armor instead... the pet fighting thing seems dumb now...

bilateralrope · May 10, 2006, 01:55 AM // 01:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir_BlackJack

*cough*

Secondary Ranger?

16bm on a primary vs 12bm on a secondary.

Still, as long as its a purely optional setup, I dont care.

BrotherGilburt · May 10, 2006, 05:12 AM // 05:12

I'm afraid I still can't bring my self to see pet fights in cities. Also, it can already be done if you choose anyway. 1v1 guild scrimage. Bring no weapons but all pet attack skills. It just not what GW is about. It would make the game somewhat weird and it would possibly unbalence it somewhat if they actually gave faction for it.

/notsigned

Pet armor I think would also change the game. Makeing pets take armor to keep there armor rating would make it more expensive for ranger to progress through the game. Also you could get ran to droks and buy your level 5 pet droks pet armor. This would be an unfair advantage. Pet shouldn't be like that. But if Anet added full armor sets with not stats that didn't effect your pet at all it would just be stupid!

/notsigned

Brother Gilburt

xerverkillah · May 10, 2006, 05:16 AM // 05:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misa

/not signed.

this sounds like a pokemon match o_o

qft

why pet fight when you have PvP???

Tongloid Tarthwood · May 10, 2006, 06:44 PM // 18:44

Just by this idea I am thinking of all the things that could go wrong. What do you do with people who get ran to Droks and come back with the best armour and skills for their pets, and kill your pet and call you a noob? What do you do for all the problems in pvp at the moment made worse by it being with animals?

Guild Wars is one of my favourite games. Please don't try and make it like neopets or something. I don't feel like The Sims Animals today. Leave me alone...